Experiments DB Dev
0e9263b958
Add tdcs_model_summary as the single place that renders a fitted model verbatim (disp(model) with the Command-Window <strong> markup stripped), and route every report through it so all scenarios emit the complete model-fitting output: - tdcs_report: adds the learning-rate GLMM's full summary (count/rate already had theirs); localCleanDisp now delegates to the shared helper. - tdcs_lme_report / tdcs_paper_lme: embed the full fitlme summary before the curated effect table. - tdcs_phase_lme: appends each phase's full fitlme summary. Tests: tReport asserts 3 native summaries in a GLMM report; tLme asserts the lme_*/paper_*/phase_* reports embed 1/1/3 summaries with markup stripped. Suite 39/39. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
71 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
71 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
LINEAR MIXED MODEL (days x tDCS) -- scenario: lme_unmerged_full
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: success ~ day * tDCS + (1|subject) [tDCS: Electrode-Box-B2 = 1 vs Electrode-Box-A2 = 0]
|
|
N = 6 subjects, 71 sessions
|
|
day coverage: Box-B2 0..14, Box-A2 0..13
|
|
(day is raw and 0-indexed: our day 0 = the paper's "Day 1", so the tDCS
|
|
main effect below is the group difference on Day 1 -- comparable to the paper.)
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme: success ~ day*tDCS + (1|subject)
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
|
|
|
|
Model information:
|
|
Number of observations 71
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients 4
|
|
Random effects coefficients 6
|
|
Covariance parameters 2
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
success ~ 1 + day*tDCS + (1 | subject)
|
|
|
|
Model fit statistics:
|
|
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
|
|
596.33 609.9 -292.16 584.33
|
|
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
|
|
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} 21.53 5.5382 3.8874 67 0.00023506
|
|
{'day' } 6.6587 0.72367 9.2014 67 1.6706e-13
|
|
{'tDCS' } 8.0204 7.6977 1.0419 67 0.3012
|
|
{'day:tDCS' } 0.93747 0.9187 1.0204 67 0.3112
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
10.475 32.584
|
|
5.2143 8.1032
|
|
-7.3444 23.385
|
|
-0.89627 2.7712
|
|
|
|
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
|
|
Group: subject (6 Levels)
|
|
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 5.7931
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
2.4723 13.574
|
|
|
|
Group: Error
|
|
Name Estimate Lower Upper
|
|
{'Res Std'} 14.163 11.93 16.813
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect t (df) F (df1) p
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
days x tDCS (interaction) t(67)= 1.02 F(1)= 1.041 p=0.3112
|
|
days (learning) t(67)= 9.20 F(1)= 84.665 p=1.671e-13
|
|
tDCS (main, at Day 1) t(67)= 1.04 F(1)= 1.086 p=0.3012
|
|
|
|
INTERPRETATION
|
|
- days x tDCS interaction: n.s. (p=0.3112, slope diff=0.94) -> slopes are parallel (no differential change over training).
|
|
- days (learning): SIGNIFICANT (p=1.7e-13) -> performance improves with training.
|
|
- tDCS main effect on Day 1 (our day 0): n.s. (p=0.3012) -> the groups are comparable (as in the paper) on Day 1.
|
|
|
|
Paper reference (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008;
|
|
days t(227)=9.64, F(1)=267.64, p=1.2e-18; tDCS t(227)=0.23, F(1)=0.053, p=0.81.
|
|
(Our N and exact statistics differ; this replicates the MODEL FORM on our data.)
|