8a18c894dd
Every fitlme-based report (lme_*, paper_*, phase_*, and the variations' analyze.m) now shows, per effect: residual-DF p, Satterthwaite-DF p, and -- for the interaction -- an HONEST test from a per-animal random-SLOPE model (day|rat), whose Satterthwaite DF collapses toward the animal count. New: tdcs_random_slope_interaction.m (shared helper). Wired into tdcs_lme, tdcs_paper_lme, tdcs_phase_lme, variation_analyze; SUMMARY.csv gains interaction_p_satt / interaction_p_rs. Regenerated all results/, variations/, matched-effort outputs. Key point this surfaces: Satterthwaite ~= residual on the random-INTERCEPT model (the slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication; the random-slope model does. Effect: full-range mergeA2 interaction 0.009 -> 0.75 (collapses); unmerge_d0_5 0.015 -> 0.13 (n.s.); the pooled-control early windows survive honestly (naive_a2_d0_5 0.001 -> 0.028; naive_boxa_d0_5 0.003 -> 0.036). Suite 42/42. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
77 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
77 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
PAPER LME REPLICATION -- mergeNaive (days 0-10)
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) [stim: Electrode-Box-B2=1 vs Electrode-Box-A2=0]
|
|
behavior = successful reaches (COUNT per session)
|
|
N = 11 rats, 115 sessions (day raw; day 0 = paper "Day 1")
|
|
day coverage: stim(B2) 0..10, control(A2) 0..10
|
|
(Equal day coverage -- the stim:day interaction over this window is NOT
|
|
confounded by the full-range coverage imbalance.)
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat)
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
|
|
|
|
Model information:
|
|
Number of observations 115
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients 4
|
|
Random effects coefficients 11
|
|
Covariance parameters 2
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
behavior ~ 1 + day*stim + (1 | rat)
|
|
|
|
Model fit statistics:
|
|
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
|
|
952.54 969.01 -470.27 940.54
|
|
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
|
|
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} 10.33 4.3573 2.3706 111 0.019482
|
|
{'day' } 8.0907 0.51948 15.575 111 1.0806e-29
|
|
{'stim' } 9.4432 7.1538 1.32 111 0.18954
|
|
{'day:stim' } 1.6184 0.8216 1.9699 111 0.051345
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
1.6953 18.964
|
|
7.0613 9.12
|
|
-4.7326 23.619
|
|
-0.0096134 3.2465
|
|
|
|
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
|
|
Group: rat (11 Levels)
|
|
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 8.4877
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
5.0001 14.408
|
|
|
|
Group: Error
|
|
Name Estimate Lower Upper
|
|
{'Res Std'} 13.352 11.652 15.299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
stim x day (interaction) t(111)= 1.97 F(1)= 3.880 p=0.05134 p=0.05149 (df=105)
|
|
day (learning) t(111)= 15.57 F(1)=242.567 p=1.081e-29 p=3.188e-29 (df=107)
|
|
stim (main, Day 1) t(111)= 1.32 F(1)= 1.742 p=0.1895 p=0.2003 (df=22)
|
|
interaction 95% CI: [-0.01, +3.25]
|
|
|
|
HONEST LME -- per-rat random slope (day|rat): interaction F(1,10.1)=2.00, p=0.1875
|
|
Satterthwaite DF on the random-INTERCEPT model above stays ~= residual (the
|
|
slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication. A per-animal
|
|
random slope collapses the interaction DF toward the animal count -- the honest test.
|
|
|
|
INTERPRETATION
|
|
- stim x day interaction: n.s. (p=0.0513, slope diff=+1.62) -> slopes parallel -- no differential learning rate over this window.
|
|
- stim main effect on Day 1 (our day 0): n.s. (p=0.1895) -> groups are comparable on Day 1.
|
|
|
|
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008; day t(227)=9.64,
|
|
F(1)=267.64, p=1.2e-18; stim t(227)=0.23, F(1)=0.053, p=0.81.
|