378ad6da05
Add variation_logpower.m (self-contained) + make_variation_logpower.m, dropping logpowersim.m + logpower_result.txt into all 28 variation folders. Matches the paper's power code: models behavior ~ stim + log(day) + stim:log(day) + (1|rat) (log(day+1), since our day 0 = paper Day 1), reports Cohen's f (partial eta^2 of the interaction) and the interaction under residual/Satterthwaite/honest random-slope DF, then runs the Monte-Carlo power sim on the log-day ground truth (per-animal cluster-honest + LME power). Notable: under log(day) the accumulating divergence is captured more sharply, so several full-window scenarios reach honest significance that were n.s. under raw day (e.g. right_only_d0_13 honest p=0.003, unmerge_d0_13 0.021, unmerge_d0_10 0.036); Cohen's f is small-medium (~0.10-0.34). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
37 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
37 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
LOG-DAY MODEL + COHEN'S f + POWER -- boxa_b2_d6_10
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: behavior ~ stim + log(day) + stim:log(day) + (1|rat) (success COUNT)
|
|
log(day) uses 1-indexed training day (our day 0 = paper "Day 1")
|
|
observed groups: stim n=4, control n=2 nrep=120, alpha=0.05
|
|
|
|
--- fitted on real data ---
|
|
stim x log(day) interaction: F(1,26)=0.850 p(resid)=0.365 p(Satt)=0.3657 (df=24)
|
|
honest per-animal random slope (log-day): F(1,6.0)=0.67 p=0.4431
|
|
Cohen's f (interaction, partial eta^2=0.014) = 0.118 (small-medium; f: .10 small, .25 medium, .40 large)
|
|
|
|
--- power simulation (log-day ground truth: stim:logday=+18.32, ratSD=6.21, resSD=8.20) ---
|
|
|
|
true stim:log(day) = +18.32 (100% of observed)
|
|
N/group | per-animal power | LME power
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
3 | 0.06 | 0.17
|
|
5 | 0.17 | 0.26
|
|
8 | 0.27 | 0.36
|
|
12 | 0.41 | 0.42
|
|
16 | 0.57 | 0.63
|
|
24 | 0.75 | 0.78
|
|
|
|
true stim:log(day) = +9.16 (50% of observed)
|
|
N/group | per-animal power | LME power
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
3 | 0.07 | 0.11
|
|
5 | 0.10 | 0.12
|
|
8 | 0.07 | 0.13
|
|
12 | 0.16 | 0.15
|
|
16 | 0.20 | 0.20
|
|
24 | 0.31 | 0.31
|
|
|
|
Read the per-animal column as the honest power; the LME column matches the
|
|
paper's power code (anova interaction p, observation-level DF) and is optimistic.
|