Experiments DB Dev
8a18c894dd
Every fitlme-based report (lme_*, paper_*, phase_*, and the variations' analyze.m) now shows, per effect: residual-DF p, Satterthwaite-DF p, and -- for the interaction -- an HONEST test from a per-animal random-SLOPE model (day|rat), whose Satterthwaite DF collapses toward the animal count. New: tdcs_random_slope_interaction.m (shared helper). Wired into tdcs_lme, tdcs_paper_lme, tdcs_phase_lme, variation_analyze; SUMMARY.csv gains interaction_p_satt / interaction_p_rs. Regenerated all results/, variations/, matched-effort outputs. Key point this surfaces: Satterthwaite ~= residual on the random-INTERCEPT model (the slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication; the random-slope model does. Effect: full-range mergeA2 interaction 0.009 -> 0.75 (collapses); unmerge_d0_5 0.015 -> 0.13 (n.s.); the pooled-control early windows survive honestly (naive_a2_d0_5 0.001 -> 0.028; naive_boxa_d0_5 0.003 -> 0.036). Suite 42/42. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
69 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
69 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
VARIATION: right_only_d6_10
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) (behavior = success COUNT)
|
|
day = training day within window (0 = first analyzed day)
|
|
treatment (stim=1): Electrode-Box-B2, Right-Electrode
|
|
control (stim=0): Electrode-Box-A2
|
|
N = 6 rats, 30 sessions raw day coverage: treat 6..10, control 6..10
|
|
(equal day coverage over this window)
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
|
|
|
|
Model information:
|
|
Number of observations 30
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients 4
|
|
Random effects coefficients 6
|
|
Covariance parameters 2
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
behavior ~ 1 + day*stim + (1 | rat)
|
|
|
|
Model fit statistics:
|
|
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
|
|
230.64 239.05 -109.32 218.64
|
|
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
|
|
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} 74.2 6.0309 12.303 26 2.4061e-12
|
|
{'day' } 2.4 1.8291 1.3121 26 0.20096
|
|
{'stim' } 11.9 7.3864 1.6111 26 0.11924
|
|
{'day:stim' } 2.425 2.2402 1.0825 26 0.28898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
61.803 86.597
|
|
-1.3599 6.1599
|
|
-3.2829 27.083
|
|
-2.1799 7.0299
|
|
|
|
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
|
|
Group: rat (6 Levels)
|
|
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 5.7092
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
2.5487 12.789
|
|
|
|
Group: Error
|
|
Name Estimate Lower Upper
|
|
{'Res Std'} 8.1802 6.1646 10.855
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
stim x day (interaction) t(26)= 1.08 F(1)= 1.172 p=0.289 p=0.2898 (df=24)
|
|
day (learning) t(26)= 1.31 F(1)= 1.722 p=0.201 p=0.2019 (df=24)
|
|
stim (main, window start) t(26)= 1.61 F(1)= 2.596 p=0.1192 p=0.1297 (df=14)
|
|
interaction 95% CI: [-2.18, +7.03]
|
|
HONEST LME (per-animal random slope, day|rat): interaction F(1,6.0)=0.90, p=0.3784
|
|
(Satterthwaite DF ~= residual on this random-intercept model; the random-slope
|
|
model above is the honest learning-rate test -- DF collapses toward the animal count.)
|
|
INTERPRETATION: stim x day interaction n.s. -- slopes parallel (no differential learning rate) (p=0.289, slope diff=+2.42)
|
|
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008.
|