Experiments DB Dev
8a18c894dd
Every fitlme-based report (lme_*, paper_*, phase_*, and the variations' analyze.m) now shows, per effect: residual-DF p, Satterthwaite-DF p, and -- for the interaction -- an HONEST test from a per-animal random-SLOPE model (day|rat), whose Satterthwaite DF collapses toward the animal count. New: tdcs_random_slope_interaction.m (shared helper). Wired into tdcs_lme, tdcs_paper_lme, tdcs_phase_lme, variation_analyze; SUMMARY.csv gains interaction_p_satt / interaction_p_rs. Regenerated all results/, variations/, matched-effort outputs. Key point this surfaces: Satterthwaite ~= residual on the random-INTERCEPT model (the slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication; the random-slope model does. Effect: full-range mergeA2 interaction 0.009 -> 0.75 (collapses); unmerge_d0_5 0.015 -> 0.13 (n.s.); the pooled-control early windows survive honestly (naive_a2_d0_5 0.001 -> 0.028; naive_boxa_d0_5 0.003 -> 0.036). Suite 42/42. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
69 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
69 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
VARIATION: right_only_d0_10
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) (behavior = success COUNT)
|
|
day = training day within window (0 = first analyzed day)
|
|
treatment (stim=1): Electrode-Box-B2, Right-Electrode
|
|
control (stim=0): Electrode-Box-A2
|
|
N = 7 rats, 72 sessions raw day coverage: treat 0..10, control 0..10
|
|
(equal day coverage over this window)
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
|
|
|
|
Model information:
|
|
Number of observations 72
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients 4
|
|
Random effects coefficients 7
|
|
Covariance parameters 2
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
behavior ~ 1 + day*stim + (1 | rat)
|
|
|
|
Model fit statistics:
|
|
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
|
|
581.39 595.05 -284.69 569.39
|
|
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
|
|
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} 17.35 5.0416 3.4414 68 0.00099395
|
|
{'day' } 7.979 0.75658 10.546 68 5.9429e-16
|
|
{'stim' } 2.4226 6.6282 0.36549 68 0.71588
|
|
{'day:stim' } 1.73 0.94724 1.8264 68 0.07218
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
7.2897 27.411
|
|
6.4693 9.4888
|
|
-10.804 15.649
|
|
-0.16015 3.6202
|
|
|
|
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
|
|
Group: rat (7 Levels)
|
|
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 5.3461
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
2.377 12.024
|
|
|
|
Group: Error
|
|
Name Estimate Lower Upper
|
|
{'Res Std'} 11.956 10.063 14.205
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
stim x day (interaction) t(68)= 1.83 F(1)= 3.336 p=0.07218 p=0.07218 (df=68)
|
|
day (learning) t(68)= 10.55 F(1)=111.222 p=5.943e-16 p=4.533e-16 (df=70)
|
|
stim (main, window start) t(68)= 0.37 F(1)= 0.134 p=0.7159 p=0.7187 (df=19)
|
|
interaction 95% CI: [-0.16, +3.62]
|
|
HONEST LME (per-animal random slope, day|rat): interaction F(1,20.5)=2.56, p=0.1246
|
|
(Satterthwaite DF ~= residual on this random-intercept model; the random-slope
|
|
model above is the honest learning-rate test -- DF collapses toward the animal count.)
|
|
INTERPRETATION: stim x day interaction n.s. -- slopes parallel (no differential learning rate) (p=0.07218, slope diff=+1.73)
|
|
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008.
|