Files
experiments-database/analysis/matlab/variations/boxa_a2_d0_10/result.txt
T
Experiments DB Dev e1af1af7f4 analysis(matlab): Box-A pooling variations (b2 vs a2+a, b2+a vs a2)
Add make_boxa_variations.m producing 6 variation folders (data.csv + analyze.m
+ result.txt) for the paper LME over windows 0-5, 6-10, 0-10:
  boxa_a2  B2         vs A2 + Box-A   (b2 vs a2+a)
  boxa_b2  B2 + Box-A vs A2           (b2+a vs a2)
plus variations/boxa_summary.csv (residual / Satterthwaite / random-slope
interaction p). Early window (0-5) is obs-level significant (res p~0.03-0.04)
but n.s. under the honest random-slope test (rs p~0.13); later windows n.s.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 13:39:01 -04:00

69 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext

==============================================================================
VARIATION: boxa_a2_d0_10
==============================================================================
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) (behavior = success COUNT)
day = training day within window (0 = first analyzed day)
treatment (stim=1): Electrode-Box-B2
control (stim=0): Electrode-Box-A, Electrode-Box-A2
N = 7 rats, 72 sessions raw day coverage: treat 0..10, control 0..10
(equal day coverage over this window)
==============================================================================
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme
==============================================================================
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
Model information:
Number of observations 72
Fixed effects coefficients 4
Random effects coefficients 7
Covariance parameters 2
Formula:
behavior ~ 1 + day*stim + (1 | rat)
Model fit statistics:
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
590.8 604.46 -289.4 578.8
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
{'(Intercept)'} 15.599 3.8531 4.0485 68 0.00013444
{'day' } 8.3258 0.69175 12.036 68 1.6397e-18
{'stim' } 6.7494 5.8389 1.1559 68 0.25175
{'day:stim' } 1.1985 1.0141 1.1818 68 0.2414
Lower Upper
7.9104 23.288
6.9454 9.7061
-4.9019 18.401
-0.82514 3.2221
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
Group: rat (7 Levels)
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 0
Lower Upper
NaN NaN
Group: Error
Name Estimate Lower Upper
{'Res Std'} 13.471 11.441 15.861
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
stim x day (interaction) t(68)= 1.18 F(1)= 1.397 p=0.2414 p=0.2412 (df=72)
day (learning) t(68)= 12.04 F(1)=144.862 p=1.64e-18 p=6.575e-19 (df=72)
stim (main, window start) t(68)= 1.16 F(1)= 1.336 p=0.2517 p=0.2515 (df=72)
interaction 95% CI: [-0.83, +3.22]
HONEST LME (per-animal random slope, day|rat): interaction F(1,14.0)=0.68, p=0.4245
(Satterthwaite DF ~= residual on this random-intercept model; the random-slope
model above is the honest learning-rate test -- DF collapses toward the animal count.)
INTERPRETATION: stim x day interaction n.s. -- slopes parallel (no differential learning rate) (p=0.2414, slope diff=+1.20)
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008.