Files
experiments-database/analysis/matlab/variations/unmerge_d6_13/logpower_result.txt
T
Experiments DB Dev 378ad6da05 analysis(matlab): add log(day) model + Cohen's f + power to every variation
Add variation_logpower.m (self-contained) + make_variation_logpower.m,
dropping logpowersim.m + logpower_result.txt into all 28 variation folders.
Matches the paper's power code: models behavior ~ stim + log(day) +
stim:log(day) + (1|rat) (log(day+1), since our day 0 = paper Day 1), reports
Cohen's f (partial eta^2 of the interaction) and the interaction under
residual/Satterthwaite/honest random-slope DF, then runs the Monte-Carlo power
sim on the log-day ground truth (per-animal cluster-honest + LME power).

Notable: under log(day) the accumulating divergence is captured more sharply,
so several full-window scenarios reach honest significance that were n.s. under
raw day (e.g. right_only_d0_13 honest p=0.003, unmerge_d0_13 0.021,
unmerge_d0_10 0.036); Cohen's f is small-medium (~0.10-0.34).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 14:37:50 -04:00

37 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

==============================================================================
LOG-DAY MODEL + COHEN'S f + POWER -- unmerge_d6_13
==============================================================================
model: behavior ~ stim + log(day) + stim:log(day) + (1|rat) (success COUNT)
log(day) uses 1-indexed training day (our day 0 = paper "Day 1")
observed groups: stim n=3, control n=2 nrep=120, alpha=0.05
--- fitted on real data ---
stim x log(day) interaction: F(1,30)=3.007 p(resid)=0.09315 p(Satt)=0.0931 (df=30)
honest per-animal random slope (log-day): F(1,12.8)=2.47 p=0.1406
Cohen's f (interaction, partial eta^2=0.025) = 0.161 (small-medium; f: .10 small, .25 medium, .40 large)
--- power simulation (log-day ground truth: stim:logday=+22.97, ratSD=7.14, resSD=7.81) ---
true stim:log(day) = +22.97 (100% of observed)
N/group | per-animal power | LME power
------------------------------------------
3 | 0.47 | 0.64 <- observed
5 | 0.79 | 0.90
8 | 0.96 | 0.99
12 | 0.99 | 1.00
16 | 1.00 | 1.00
24 | 1.00 | 1.00
true stim:log(day) = +11.49 (50% of observed)
N/group | per-animal power | LME power
------------------------------------------
3 | 0.12 | 0.22 <- observed
5 | 0.26 | 0.36
8 | 0.41 | 0.47
12 | 0.53 | 0.58
16 | 0.71 | 0.74
24 | 0.90 | 0.93
Read the per-animal column as the honest power; the LME column matches the
paper's power code (anova interaction p, observation-level DF) and is optimistic.