Experiments DB Dev
8a18c894dd
Every fitlme-based report (lme_*, paper_*, phase_*, and the variations' analyze.m) now shows, per effect: residual-DF p, Satterthwaite-DF p, and -- for the interaction -- an HONEST test from a per-animal random-SLOPE model (day|rat), whose Satterthwaite DF collapses toward the animal count. New: tdcs_random_slope_interaction.m (shared helper). Wired into tdcs_lme, tdcs_paper_lme, tdcs_phase_lme, variation_analyze; SUMMARY.csv gains interaction_p_satt / interaction_p_rs. Regenerated all results/, variations/, matched-effort outputs. Key point this surfaces: Satterthwaite ~= residual on the random-INTERCEPT model (the slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication; the random-slope model does. Effect: full-range mergeA2 interaction 0.009 -> 0.75 (collapses); unmerge_d0_5 0.015 -> 0.13 (n.s.); the pooled-control early windows survive honestly (naive_a2_d0_5 0.001 -> 0.028; naive_boxa_d0_5 0.003 -> 0.036). Suite 42/42. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
69 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
69 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
VARIATION: naive_boxa_d6_10
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) (behavior = success COUNT)
|
|
day = training day within window (0 = first analyzed day)
|
|
treatment (stim=1): Electrode-Box-B2
|
|
control (stim=0): Electrode-Box-A, Electrode-Box-A2, Naive
|
|
N = 10 rats, 50 sessions raw day coverage: treat 6..10, control 6..10
|
|
(equal day coverage over this window)
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
|
|
|
|
Model information:
|
|
Number of observations 50
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients 4
|
|
Random effects coefficients 10
|
|
Covariance parameters 2
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
behavior ~ 1 + day*stim + (1 | rat)
|
|
|
|
Model fit statistics:
|
|
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
|
|
405.22 416.69 -196.61 393.22
|
|
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
|
|
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} 64.543 5.1823 12.454 46 2.4341e-16
|
|
{'day' } 5.7857 1.2123 4.7727 46 1.8769e-05
|
|
{'stim' } 23.99 9.4616 2.5356 46 0.014689
|
|
{'day:stim' } -1.619 2.2133 -0.73152 46 0.46817
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
54.111 74.974
|
|
3.3456 8.2259
|
|
4.9452 43.036
|
|
-6.0741 2.836
|
|
|
|
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
|
|
Group: rat (10 Levels)
|
|
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 11.237
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
6.7417 18.73
|
|
|
|
Group: Error
|
|
Name Estimate Lower Upper
|
|
{'Res Std'} 10.142 8.1466 12.627
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
stim x day (interaction) t(46)= -0.73 F(1)= 0.535 p=0.4682 p=0.4687 (df=40)
|
|
day (learning) t(46)= 4.77 F(1)= 22.779 p=1.877e-05 p=2.436e-05 (df=40)
|
|
stim (main, window start) t(46)= 2.54 F(1)= 6.429 p=0.01469 p=0.02198 (df=16)
|
|
interaction 95% CI: [-6.07, +2.84]
|
|
HONEST LME (per-animal random slope, day|rat): interaction F(1,10.0)=0.41, p=0.5344
|
|
(Satterthwaite DF ~= residual on this random-intercept model; the random-slope
|
|
model above is the honest learning-rate test -- DF collapses toward the animal count.)
|
|
INTERPRETATION: stim x day interaction n.s. -- slopes parallel (no differential learning rate) (p=0.4682, slope diff=-1.62)
|
|
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008.
|