Experiments DB Dev
8a18c894dd
Every fitlme-based report (lme_*, paper_*, phase_*, and the variations' analyze.m) now shows, per effect: residual-DF p, Satterthwaite-DF p, and -- for the interaction -- an HONEST test from a per-animal random-SLOPE model (day|rat), whose Satterthwaite DF collapses toward the animal count. New: tdcs_random_slope_interaction.m (shared helper). Wired into tdcs_lme, tdcs_paper_lme, tdcs_phase_lme, variation_analyze; SUMMARY.csv gains interaction_p_satt / interaction_p_rs. Regenerated all results/, variations/, matched-effort outputs. Key point this surfaces: Satterthwaite ~= residual on the random-INTERCEPT model (the slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication; the random-slope model does. Effect: full-range mergeA2 interaction 0.009 -> 0.75 (collapses); unmerge_d0_5 0.015 -> 0.13 (n.s.); the pooled-control early windows survive honestly (naive_a2_d0_5 0.001 -> 0.028; naive_boxa_d0_5 0.003 -> 0.036). Suite 42/42. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
69 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
69 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
==============================================================================
|
|
VARIATION: naive_boxa_d0_10
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) (behavior = success COUNT)
|
|
day = training day within window (0 = first analyzed day)
|
|
treatment (stim=1): Electrode-Box-B2
|
|
control (stim=0): Electrode-Box-A, Electrode-Box-A2, Naive
|
|
N = 11 rats, 115 sessions raw day coverage: treat 0..10, control 0..10
|
|
(equal day coverage over this window)
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Linear mixed-effects model fit by ML
|
|
|
|
Model information:
|
|
Number of observations 115
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients 4
|
|
Random effects coefficients 11
|
|
Covariance parameters 2
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
behavior ~ 1 + day*stim + (1 | rat)
|
|
|
|
Model fit statistics:
|
|
AIC BIC LogLikelihood Deviance
|
|
958.48 974.95 -473.24 946.48
|
|
|
|
Fixed effects coefficients (95% CIs):
|
|
Name Estimate SE tStat DF pValue
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} 10.139 4.1642 2.4349 111 0.016488
|
|
{'day' } 8.3463 0.49368 16.906 111 1.7432e-32
|
|
{'stim' } 12.209 7.8948 1.5465 111 0.12484
|
|
{'day:stim' } 1.1779 0.90166 1.3064 111 0.19412
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
1.8878 18.391
|
|
7.3681 9.3246
|
|
-3.4352 27.853
|
|
-0.60877 2.9646
|
|
|
|
Random effects covariance parameters (95% CIs):
|
|
Group: rat (11 Levels)
|
|
Name1 Name2 Type Estimate
|
|
{'(Intercept)'} {'(Intercept)'} {'std'} 8.6713
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Upper
|
|
5.112 14.709
|
|
|
|
Group: Error
|
|
Name Estimate Lower Upper
|
|
{'Res Std'} 13.706 11.962 15.704
|
|
|
|
|
|
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
stim x day (interaction) t(111)= 1.31 F(1)= 1.707 p=0.1941 p=0.1943 (df=104)
|
|
day (learning) t(111)= 16.91 F(1)=285.824 p=1.743e-32 p=6.758e-32 (df=106)
|
|
stim (main, window start) t(111)= 1.55 F(1)= 2.392 p=0.1248 p=0.1361 (df=22)
|
|
interaction 95% CI: [-0.61, +2.96]
|
|
HONEST LME (per-animal random slope, day|rat): interaction F(1,10.1)=0.83, p=0.3836
|
|
(Satterthwaite DF ~= residual on this random-intercept model; the random-slope
|
|
model above is the honest learning-rate test -- DF collapses toward the animal count.)
|
|
INTERPRETATION: stim x day interaction n.s. -- slopes parallel (no differential learning rate) (p=0.1941, slope diff=+1.18)
|
|
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008.
|