# MATLAB port of the tDCS GLM analysis — Design **Date:** 2026-07-20 **Status:** Approved (design) **Location:** `analysis/matlab/` **Ports:** the Python analysis in `analysis/` (`tdcs_glm.py`, `METHODS.md`) to MATLAB. ## Goal Reproduce the tDCS reaching analysis in MATLAB: consume raw exports from the app, derive the day-window × merge-scenario variations, run each scenario independently via `switch/case`, and print the raw GLM output plus a plain-language interpretation. Include a `matlab.unittest` test suite. ## Environment - MATLAB **R2025b** + **Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox** installed at `~/matlab` (via `mpm`). Requires the user's license to be **activated** before anything runs (`~/matlab/bin/activate_matlab.sh`, or a license file in `~/matlab/licenses/`). - Headless execution: `~/matlab/bin/matlab -batch ""`. Tests run via `matlab -batch "run_tests"`. **The MATLAB code and tests cannot be executed in the dev environment until the license is active** — they are written first and run once licensing is in place. ## Modeling engine MATLAB has no GEE; the port uses **`fitglme`** (generalized linear mixed model) with a **per-subject random intercept** as the single primary estimator — this folds the Python GEE + random-intercept models into one native tool. The Python mixed model already agreed with its GEE, so results should track. Reference group is **Electrode-Box-B2**; `day_c` is the mean-centered training day and `day_c2 = day_c^2` captures the plateau. Models per scenario (on the scenario's data table): - **Count:** `success ~ group + day_c + day_c2 + (1|subject)`, `Distribution='Poisson'` → IRRs vs B2. - **Rate:** `success ~ group + day_c + day_c2 + (1|subject)`, `Distribution='Binomial'`, `BinomialSize=total` → odds ratios. Zero-attempt sessions (`total==0`, undefined rate) are dropped for this model only; the count model keeps them (they are genuine 0-success observations). - **Learning rate:** `success ~ group*day_c + day_c2 + (1|subject)`, Poisson → group×day slope differences + a joint `coefTest`. - **Per-animal:** collapse each animal to one number (mean count; pooled rate = Σsuccess/Σtotal), then `ttest2` (Welch) and `ranksum` (Mann-Whitney, one-sided) — the honest small-n check. - **`unmerged_*` scenarios only:** classify Box-A and Right-Electrode against **both** anchors via `coefTest` contrasts → A2-like / B2-like / ambiguous. ## Data flow ``` raw/raw_success.csv ┐ raw/raw_total.csv ┴─ tdcs_load_data → long table {subject,group,day,success,total} → tdcs_scenario_data(scenario) → filtered+merged table (saved: derived/.csv) → fitglme models → console + results/.txt ``` ### Raw files (produced now, in the website's export format) Two app-style matrices, identical to the app's **Export Data** output with X = "# Days Reach", Group by = "Group": - `raw/raw_success.csv` — Data = Success - `raw/raw_total.csv` — Data = Total attempts Format (both): ``` Data, Group, # Days Reach, , ... ``` These are generated from the running app (via the same export logic) and are byte-for-byte what the UI would export; the user can regenerate them from the UI. ### `tdcs_load_data.m` Parses the matrix format (skips the `Data,` line and blank line, reads the `Group` row, the `# Days Reach` + subject-header row, then the day rows), reshapes both matrices to long, and joins on (subject, day) to produce one table with `subject, group, day, success, total`. Drops blank cells; applies day ≥ 0. Returns the full long table (all 5 groups, Box-A included). ## Scenarios (`switch/case`, 6 self-contained cases) `tdcs_glm(scenario)` dispatches on the scenario name; each case runs end-to-end and can be run alone. Cases: | case | merge | window | |---|---|---| | `unmerged_full` | 5 groups (classify Box-A & Right) | days 0–26 | | `unmerged_d0_10` | 5 groups | days 0–10 | | `mergeA2_full` | Box-A→A2, Right→B2 | 0–26 | | `mergeA2_d0_10` | Box-A→A2, Right→B2 | 0–10 | | `mergeB2_full` | Box-A→B2, Right→B2 | 0–26 | | `mergeB2_d0_10` | Box-A→B2, Right→B2 | 0–10 | Merge maps: `mergeA2 = {Electrode-Box-A→Electrode-Box-A2, Right-Electrode→Electrode-Box-B2}`; `mergeB2 = {Electrode-Box-A→Electrode-Box-B2, Right-Electrode→Electrode-Box-B2}`. Each case saves its derived scenario table to `derived/.csv`. `run_all.m` loops all six; `run_tests.m` runs the test suite. ## Printed output per scenario To console and `results/.txt`: 1. **Descriptives** — per group: n_subjects, n_sessions, mean success count, pooled rate. 2. **Raw GLM** — the literal `fitglme` fixed-effects table (Estimate, SE, tStat, pValue, CI) for count and rate models, plus the learning-rate joint test statistic/p. 3. **Interpretation** — plain language mirroring the Python verdicts: H2 (B2 vs A2) as IRR/OR + one-sided p + SUPPORTED/not; per-animal p-values; classification (unmerged only); and the standing caveats (n=3–4/group, single-subject fragility, count vs rate). ## Files ``` analysis/matlab/ raw/raw_success.csv, raw/raw_total.csv # generated inputs (website format) tdcs_load_data.m # parse + reshape + join → long table tdcs_scenario_data.m # apply merge map + day window; save derived tdcs_models.m # fit GLMMs, per-animal tests, classification, contrasts tdcs_report.m # format descriptives + raw GLM + interpretation tdcs_glm.m # switch/case entry over the 6 scenarios run_all.m, run_tests.m derived/ results/ # outputs (created at runtime) tests/ tLoadData.m # join correctness (verified cells), day filter, zero-attempt drop tScenarioData.m # per-scenario groups/subject counts, window caps tModels.m # golden-value/direction checks vs the Python numbers (loose tolerance) ``` ## Testing `matlab.unittest`, run headless via `matlab -batch "run_tests"`: - **Data:** `tdcs_load_data` join correct — verified cells (e.g. Vu-vuong day0 success=18, total=61; Banh-mi-1 day0 success=13) and per-group subject counts; day≥0 and zero-attempt handling. - **Scenario derivation:** each scenario yields the right groups/subjects (`mergeB2` → B2=5 subjects, A2=3; `mergeA2` → 4/4/4; `d0_10` caps at day 10) and saves `derived/.csv`. - **Model sanity / golden values:** GLM results land near the Python numbers within a loose tolerance and match direction — e.g. `mergeB2_full` rate H2 odds ≈ 1.4–1.6 with B2>A2; anchor H2 supported on rate; `unmerged` classification labels. GLMM ≠ GEE exactly, so magnitude tolerances are wide but sign/ordering checks are strict. Executed once the license is active; written but unrun until then (flagged in the report). ## Out of scope (YAGNI) - Re-implementing GEE / cluster-robust sandwich SEs (using native `fitglme` instead). - The learning-curve plots (the Python `.png`s remain; not re-created in MATLAB unless asked). - Changing the Python analysis (it stays as the reference). - Bayesian mixed model (the Python MAP sensitivity has no direct `fitglme` analog and is dropped; the GLMM *is* the random-intercept model).