samsam2610/experiments-database
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(matlab): add Satterthwaite DF + honest random-slope test to LME reports

Browse Source 
Every fitlme-based report (lme_*, paper_*, phase_*, and the variations'
analyze.m) now shows, per effect: residual-DF p, Satterthwaite-DF p, and --
for the interaction -- an HONEST test from a per-animal random-SLOPE model
(day|rat), whose Satterthwaite DF collapses toward the animal count.

New: tdcs_random_slope_interaction.m (shared helper). Wired into tdcs_lme,
tdcs_paper_lme, tdcs_phase_lme, variation_analyze; SUMMARY.csv gains
interaction_p_satt / interaction_p_rs. Regenerated all results/, variations/,
matched-effort outputs.

Key point this surfaces: Satterthwaite ~= residual on the random-INTERCEPT
model (the slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix
pseudoreplication; the random-slope model does. Effect: full-range mergeA2
interaction 0.009 -> 0.75 (collapses); unmerge_d0_5 0.015 -> 0.13 (n.s.);
the pooled-control early windows survive honestly (naive_a2_d0_5 0.001 ->
0.028; naive_boxa_d0_5 0.003 -> 0.036). Suite 42/42.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Experiments DB Dev
2026-07-22 15:45:19 -04:00
parent 5fcd97f81a
commit 8a18c894dd
77 changed files with 2066 additions and 345 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
analysis/matlab/results/paper_unmerged.txt
+18 -6
View File
@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
==============================================================================
PAPER LME REPLICATION -- unmerged
PAPER LME REPLICATION -- unmerged (full range)
==============================================================================
model: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat) [stim: Electrode-Box-B2=1 vs Electrode-Box-A2=0]
behavior = successful reaches (COUNT per session)
N = 6 rats, 71 sessions (day raw; day 0 = paper "Day 1")
day coverage: stim(B2) 0..14, control(A2) 0..13
(Equal day coverage -- the stim:day interaction over this window is NOT
confounded by the full-range coverage imbalance.)
==============================================================================
FULL MODEL SUMMARY -- fitlme: behavior ~ stim + day + stim:day + (1|rat)
@@ -53,12 +56,21 @@ Group: Error
effect t (df) F (df1) p
------------------------------------------------------------------
stim x day (interaction) t(67)= 1.02 F(1)= 1.041 p=0.3112
day (learning) t(67)= 9.20 F(1)= 84.665 p=1.671e-13
stim (main, Day 1) t(67)= 1.04 F(1)= 1.086 p=0.3012
effect t(df) / F(df1) p (resid) Satterthwaite: p (df)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
stim x day (interaction) t(67)= 1.02 F(1)= 1.041 p=0.3112 p=0.3111 (df=70)
day (learning) t(67)= 9.20 F(1)= 84.665 p=1.671e-13 p=1.04e-13 (df=71)
stim (main, Day 1) t(67)= 1.04 F(1)= 1.086 p=0.3012 p=0.3116 (df=18)
interaction 95% CI: [-0.90, +2.77]
HONEST LME -- per-rat random slope (day|rat): interaction F(1,8.8)=0.61, p=0.456
Satterthwaite DF on the random-INTERCEPT model above stays ~= residual (the
slope's error is at session level), so it does NOT fix pseudoreplication. A per-animal
random slope collapses the interaction DF toward the animal count -- the honest test.
INTERPRETATION
- stim x day interaction: n.s. (p=0.3112, slope diff=+0.94) -> slopes parallel -- no differential learning rate over this window.
- stim main effect on Day 1 (our day 0): n.s. (p=0.3012) -> groups are comparable on Day 1.
Paper (N=24): interaction t(227)=2.68, F(1)=7.12, p=0.008; day t(227)=9.64,
F(1)=267.64, p=1.2e-18; stim t(227)=0.23, F(1)=0.053, p=0.81.