analysis(matlab): add log(day) model + Cohen's f + power to every variation
Add variation_logpower.m (self-contained) + make_variation_logpower.m, dropping logpowersim.m + logpower_result.txt into all 28 variation folders. Matches the paper's power code: models behavior ~ stim + log(day) + stim:log(day) + (1|rat) (log(day+1), since our day 0 = paper Day 1), reports Cohen's f (partial eta^2 of the interaction) and the interaction under residual/Satterthwaite/honest random-slope DF, then runs the Monte-Carlo power sim on the log-day ground truth (per-animal cluster-honest + LME power). Notable: under log(day) the accumulating divergence is captured more sharply, so several full-window scenarios reach honest significance that were n.s. under raw day (e.g. right_only_d0_13 honest p=0.003, unmerge_d0_13 0.021, unmerge_d0_10 0.036); Cohen's f is small-medium (~0.10-0.34). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
LOG-DAY MODEL + COHEN'S f + POWER -- boxa_a2_d0_10
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
model: behavior ~ stim + log(day) + stim:log(day) + (1|rat) (success COUNT)
|
||||
log(day) uses 1-indexed training day (our day 0 = paper "Day 1")
|
||||
observed groups: stim n=3, control n=4 nrep=120, alpha=0.05
|
||||
|
||||
--- fitted on real data ---
|
||||
stim x log(day) interaction: F(1,68)=3.821 p(resid)=0.05474 p(Satt)=0.05451 (df=72)
|
||||
honest per-animal random slope (log-day): F(1,14.6)=3.22 p=0.09348
|
||||
Cohen's f (interaction, partial eta^2=0.009) = 0.097 (small; f: .10 small, .25 medium, .40 large)
|
||||
|
||||
--- power simulation (log-day ground truth: stim:logday=+8.69, ratSD=0.00, resSD=13.42) ---
|
||||
|
||||
true stim:log(day) = +8.69 (100% of observed)
|
||||
N/group | per-animal power | LME power
|
||||
------------------------------------------
|
||||
3 | 0.23 | 0.47 <- observed
|
||||
5 | 0.57 | 0.72
|
||||
8 | 0.83 | 0.87
|
||||
12 | 0.98 | 0.99
|
||||
16 | 0.99 | 1.00
|
||||
24 | 1.00 | 1.00
|
||||
|
||||
true stim:log(day) = +4.34 (50% of observed)
|
||||
N/group | per-animal power | LME power
|
||||
------------------------------------------
|
||||
3 | 0.07 | 0.12 <- observed
|
||||
5 | 0.11 | 0.19
|
||||
8 | 0.30 | 0.38
|
||||
12 | 0.34 | 0.40
|
||||
16 | 0.62 | 0.64
|
||||
24 | 0.75 | 0.78
|
||||
|
||||
Read the per-animal column as the honest power; the LME column matches the
|
||||
paper's power code (anova interaction p, observation-level DF) and is optimistic.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user